Action/Mystery/Thriller

“Lost” in Space: Star Trek

May 10, 2009
By

Overall Rating: A
Filmmaking/Artistic: A+
Storytelling: A
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

Clearly the best Star Trek movie ever made, this movie is a stand out, for both fans and non-fans of the original late 60′s series.  JJ Abrams, the wizard behind the TV show Lost, skillfully combines action, humor, and character development in this two hour thrill ride.

Full Review

First, the biases.  Your Movie Monkey is a fan of the original Star Trek series, and a fan of Lost, the brainchild of JJ Abrams, who directs this movie.  But Your Movie Monkey saw the film in the company of 9 other people, some of whom were not fans of neither, and all found it riveting. 

The film opens with the birth of James Kirk… but, in true JJ Abrams fashion, in a way that is both contradictory to, and consistent with, the original series.  For those other Lost fans out there, one can immediately feel the pleasant familiarity of  what you like about the TV series… the emotion mixed with action, the camera shots, everything.

This particular film depicts Kirk as a rebellious kid, who ends up joining StarFleet after a barfight with new recruits.  Brilliantly acted by Chris Pine, Kirk is a believable version of the overacted character we all know from Shatner.  Smarmy and sarcastic, possessing all of Kirk’s confidence without the distracting method acting pregnant pauses, Pine portrays a street smart fighter, overconfident with youth, yet clearly leader material.

At the academy we meet the younger versions of Dr. McCoy, Uhura, and the (in)famous green girl.  We also learn more about the backstory of Spock, as he grew up to the prejudice of being of mixed race, even on logical Vulcan.  Captain Pike (of the one-vs-two blink full body wheelchair for those of you familiar with the original series) also plays a good role in the film, and we get to know the young Sulu, Chekov, and (although not nearly as young) Scotty.

The magic of the movie is how it references the old films, but not in a corny way, while being completely unique.  The action makes the story interesting, and the “sci fi” elements are present, but not overwhelming (no takion fileds, Krieger waves, etc.)  It’s easy to follow, and yet Abrams gives us plenty of reason to be in suspense, because, for reasons Your Movie Monkey won’t give away, it is not guaranteed that any of the film’s characters will survive.  (Think Lost, but not so complicated, and no smoke monster.) 

There’s no real sense in describing the story here.  It’s not a terribly original storyline, but it doesn’t matter, because characters and action drive the movie.  Fans of action type shows will likely love it, as will fans of the original series, and pretty much movie fans everywhere.  The acting is fantastic, (Simon Pegg absolutely steals all scenes as Scotty), for the most part better than the original, and the story keeps you intrigued for the entire two hours.   Even Eric Bana is, for the most part, tolerable.  (The weakest link for sure, but it won’t be too distracting.)

Your Movie Monkey hasn’t gone into as much detail as he usually would, but thinks you should see it for yourself.

In terms of objectionable material, if they cut maybe 40 seconds, it could be PG instead of PG-13.   Some brief objectionable language, and a brief “adult situation” render this show inappropriate for kids under 13, at least IYMMHO. 

Your Movie Monkey hopes that those of you who see it will truly enjoy this nice opening to the summer action season.

Great acting.  Great

Pouty Teenage Troubles: Twilight

March 29, 2009
By

Overall Rating: D
Filmmaking/Artistic: F
Storytelling: C+
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

Unbelievably cheesy special effects, a very unsympathetic main character (acted poorly), a very brooding vampire (think James Dean with mousse and lots of lipstick), and MTV-productions level of poutiness make this movie very, very difficult to watch, especially if you’re not a girl.

Full Review

Your Movie Monkey saw this in the only venue where he would consider seeing it–while held hostage on a long overseas flight.  The Monkey is actually somewhat fond of vampire movies for what they represent.  They are often morality tales, where the victim must “give in to temptation” before being attacked.  Further, vampire movies (unlike, say, mob movies) are clearly fictional, and thus are more set up to tell a story with a moral.

Your Movie Monkey’s wife Beaudelaire is quite fond of the hit series by Stephanie Meyer, as are several other (exclusively female) friends, so while trapped on the plane, it seemed fine enough to test out.  Oy.

The main character is Bella, who is (as are almost all characters in this film except maybe the main vampire) an extreme Hollywood cliche.  She is a child of divorced parents with this cool mom who calls her up on her cell to dish about boys.  She has gone for some reason to live with her father in a town in the Northwest  (called Forks, WA, which made Your Movie Monkey want to do a whole new series set in a poor rural Texas town called Sporks), because she wants to give said cool mom the chance to motorcycle around the country with her new boyfriend, or something.  Or, more likely, because she is a morose teenager who needs more people to consume with her self-indulgent Angst. 

Bella moves in with her dad, and immediately lets him know that there is nothing he can do to make up for the fact that she hasn’t seen him in many years, and she would also like hot meals, but please not at the diner like you’ve been doing for years, thanks, dad.  (Bella is without a doubt the most unsympathetic heroine Your Movie Monkey has seen in a long time.  She’s like the Meryl Streep character in Doubt, without the humor.)  The dad is the beloved and wise-yet-simple town cop in Forks, who eats every day at the diner and knows people named Flossy. 

Dad is also best buddies with a person who is Hollywood Code for the wisest human being on earth, a Native American in a wheel chair.  This relationship become relevant because the son of the guy in the wheelchair knows Bella (but goes to school on the Res, so won’t see her much) from previous visits in Bella’s childhood, and he ends up telling her that he is descended from wolves, and wolves for some reason can see vampires for what they are, when not busy howling and marking their territory.

Anyway, Dad gifts Bella a truck (and Your Movie Monkey is sure that the inevitable complaint from Bella about the environmental consequences of a non-hybrid were thankfully edited out), and she rolls in it to The Forks WA High School for The Undead and Really Old Hollywood Cliches.  She is greeted by this Asian guy who looks like Onch and who proclaims himself to ”rule the school”.  There are also Breakfast-Club/High-School-Musical groups of kids who don’t get along with each other.

And then, there’s Edward Cullen.  Edward Cullen is, of course, the vampire, and he looks like, well, imagine you had a magazine geared at men (GQ or whatever), and you took out one of those cologne ads that has a skinny, completely shaven model in a speedo sitting at the base of a really expensive pool or perhaps alpine lake.  Now take that model and add quite a bit of lipstick, a quart and a half olf hair gel, and camera angles from any director who cut his teeth at MTV.   That’s what Edward Cullen looks like in this movie.

Edward apparently is part of a strange “family” who live in isolation, mostly so they can spend time slicking back each others’ hair.  Edward ignores Bella, despite being assigned as her “lab partner”, and will occasionally not show up for school.  But it’s clear he likes her, enough that he uses his super strength to prevent a wayward car from hitting her.  (The special effect here looks like he is doing a Vulcan mind meld with the car.  Your Movie Monkey half expected to hear him say “Your Thoughts are My Thoughts, Your Gears are My Gears” to the car.) 

The special effects are quite a problem with this movie, in that they make almost no sense.  So Edward is super strong, fine, but somehow this hurling mass of metal stops comes to a complete stop and gets a smallish dent like a fender bender.  Apparently vampires change all laws of physics as we know them.  In fact, later, in one of the cheesier moments of the movie, Bella visits the vampire family, and after chatting and giggling about how hard it was not to kill her and drink her blood, they take her out for a game of vampire baseball, because vampires, you see, hit the ball so hard that it would sound like a lightning strike to the people in the village below

So Edward and Bella strike up a relationship, mostly with Bella being condescening and morose, and Edward driven by a desire to harm her.  Edward does take her home to “meet the family” as previously described, and they all have slick backed hair and love art, and cook some dinner just for her.  Edward explains (and this was an interesting potshot at vegetarians), that they drink animal blood, but just like you can never really be satisfied with tofu, the desire for human blood was overwhelmingly strong.

During this trip, Edward shows her why they don’t go out into the sunlight.  Apparently in the book, it was because their skin glittered like diamonds, and people would figure out who they were.  In the movie, when Edward removes his shirt to explain the sunlight thing, it may have been the screen on the plane, but Your Movie Monkey thought “You don’t go out into the sunlight because you’re pasty and British?”

Oh yes, and something else we learn in this trip to the family.  Vampires can fly.  Not run fast, like in the book (according to Beaudeliare).  We’re talking “Bella, grab my neck”, a hand outstretched like Zan and Jana calling on the Wondertwin Powers, and a slow, cheesy liftoff to fly to the tops of some trees.

So, at one trip to the vamipre family, they run into a distinctly non-vegetarian group of vampires who decide they want to hunt Bella for sport, and there’s a whole lot of Angst over whose fault it all is, and the bad vampires almost get Bella, but (darn the luck), Edward saves her.  Interestingly, the bad vampire James has bitter her, and so Edward must “suck out the poison” (this is how vampires make new vampires… biting but not sucking the blood out to the point of death), and this requires this extraordinary amount of control, because as Edward has said, it is very dangerous to be around him.  (Who would have thought “cut and suck” would make such a comeback after being discredited as a snakebite cure?)

This brings up one thematic element of the movie that was quite troublesome to Your Movie Monkey.  Throughout, Edward is constantly warning Bella how hard it is for him to control himself (i.e., not kill her for her blood), and how dangerous it is to be around him, but Bella says she doesn’t care (after all, she can be morose with him her whole life and he won’t grow a day older for it!)  This seemed strangely like women who stay with abusive partners… he can’t help himself, it’s probably my fault.  Hopefully this wasn’t what was intended, but it sure seemed like that message was there.

Overall, probably the best part of the film was Robert Pattinson, who played Edward.  He cannot help the clunky, cliched direction and the leading actress whose acting was so horrific.  (A scene where he tells her that he is leaving so she won’t be threatened receives from her a ”Hey wha don’t wha hey how why wha” scene reminiscent, at best, of Uncle Buck.)   He did the best with what he was given.

The story did have some interest, in that it dreamed this world of vampires with its own mythology and reasoning.  And in the end, there was some action.  But overall, it was cheesy, with bad direction and mostly bad acting.

The one part Your Movie Monkey did like, well one line, actually, had to do with the morality play aspect of the story.  Edward explains to Bella that “every part about me draws you in…. my looks, my hair, my smell.  Not that I’d need any of that.  I’m the perfect killing machine.”  Your Movie Monkey is reminded, at least in small part, of what his daughters will face as they mature and begin to date.  Every part of these guys will draw them in.  They must be very, very careful.  Especially if one of them can fly. 

Travolta and Cyrus do us proud: Bolt

December 3, 2008
By

Overall Rating: A
Filmmaking/Artistic: A+
MPAA Rating: PG

Overview

Fantastic action, great humor at Hollywood’s expense, and the joy of being a dog.  Bolt has it all, and is fun for kids and adults.  Could be a little scary for kids 5 and under, but overall a great film, well worth seeing.

Full Review

Your Movie Monkey had his doubts.  John Travolta has admittedly a great, familiar voice, especially for those of us old enough to remember Vinnie Barbarino.  (For those of you for whom Welcome Back Kotter was before your time, as a young actor, Mr. Travolta had the power to make us elementary school kids use the phrase “up your nose widda rubber hose” as an insult.  Seriously.)  But as an actor, he’s hit or miss, with one strong hit for every 25 to 50 misses, it seems.  And Miley Cyrus, well, some of us are still smarting from Billy Ray. 

But Bolt came highly recommended from friends, and it certainly did not disappoint.  As promised in the previews, the story revolves around a dog named Bolt who is the star of a popular action show on television.  But as we learn from the oh-so-Hollywood director of the show, Bolt has been raised from puppyhood to think the show going on a round him is real, and that he really does have his superpowers.  (And, wonderfully, the reason for this ruse is a form of method acting: he wants to be able to get shots of a dog who really believes he is an action hero, so it will be realistic.)

Read more »

As Unintelligible as its Title: Quantum of Solace

November 27, 2008
By

Overall Rating: C-
Filmmaking/Artistic: C-
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

Daniel Craig as James Bond and Judi Dench as M succeed despite the pretty bad movie going on around them.  Herky-jerky editing makes even the action sequences almost unwatchable, and the plot is almost unintelligible, even for a Bond film.

Full Review

Your Movie Monkey was quite a fan of the first installment of the James Bond series starring Daniel Craig, Casino Royale.  In fact, he finds this current Bond actor to be the most, um, believable.  (OK, they are all completely unrealistic and quite un-believable, but Mr. Craig certainly is the most believable as the character.  Not quite as smarmy as Sean Connery (although Sean Connery was able to say the four-syllable word “Moneypenny” with three and a half syllables in a way that was quite distinctive, something like “MON-uh-PEN-uh”); not near as old as Roger Moore; not so Shakespearean as Timothy Dalton; and clearly more believable as an action star than the prim-but-amusing-and-likeable Pierce Brosnan.

When discussing the new Bond with various folks, you invariably get anyone over 50 saying something like “no one will ever be Bond except Connery” (with one noted exception from a colleague in my office who I believe is over 50 but who [rightly, IYMMHO] claims that Mr. Craig is the best).  However, Your Movie Monkey has found that younger folks have taken to this new, more detached Bond.  When recalling Casino Royale, most guys seem to say something like “great movie, liked the poker”.  Women, on the other hand, seem to have their eyes go slightly out of focus as they reminisce about a speedo-clad Bond walking around in the surf; luckily, only a few have actually drooled.

Read more »

Archives

Critics
Marvel's The Avengers93%
Dark Shadows42%
Think Like a Man51%
The Hunger Games84%
The Lucky One20%
The Five-Year Engagement63%
The Pirates! Band of Misfits86%
The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel76%
Chimpanzee74%
Safe55%
Critic ratings from
Audience ratings from