Sci-Fi

Journey 2: The Mysterious Island

February 13, 2012
By
 
Overall:★★½☆☆ 
Filmmaking/Artistic:★★★☆☆ 
Storytelling:★½☆☆☆ 

So, your kids should really like this one.  It isn’t terrible for adults, but then again, it isn’t all that great.

The plot is: For some reason a kid (Josh Hutcherson) and The Rock (insert 2 minutes of standard blended family boy trying to find himself shooting death eyes at stepdad) go traipsing off to somewhere near the filming of the latest season of Survivor, find a helicopter pilot from the Comic Relief Agency (25% surcharge for pilot bringing his cute daughter from High School Musical, additional 10% if she is not allowed to sing), and fly through some kind of whirlpool vortex thing straight into an updated Land of the Lost.  You know, elephants are small, dragonflies are big, stuff is dangerous, those-aren’t-rocks-they’re-eggs (gasp!), that kind of deal.  And the island is sinking and it’s really Atlantis and Michael Caine stars as long-lost-grandpa dressed up like Barbie’s Adventure Ken.  And somehow Jules Verne and Robert Louis Stevenson cooked it all up years ago.

That is to say, the story is pretty ridiculous, and doesn’t flow… it feels like one set up scene after another.

For the positive stuff, Dwayne Johnson is, as always, very good as a comedic and physical actor.  Josh Hutcherson plays his role well (looking forward to him as Peeta in Hunger Games), and Michael Caine is enjoyably hammy.  And some (but not all) of the special effects are fun.  It’s just that the script is, well, nuts.

So, go for the kids.  There is no bad language, or it is very minimal.  The Rock is funny.  The adventure is decent, if predictable and/or stupid.  But if it’s date night, pick something else.

The Immortals

January 15, 2012
By

 
Overall:★★★☆☆ 
Filmmaking/Artistic:★★★½☆ 
Storytelling:★★★☆☆ 

Basically, 300 lite.  But entertaining if you like this type of movie.

Captain America

January 15, 2012
By
 
Overall:★★½☆☆ 
Filmmaking/Artistic:★★★☆☆ 
Storytelling:★★☆☆☆ 

Standard superhero fare.  Big budget, yet somehow charisma-free.

Thor

January 15, 2012
By

 
Overall:★★★★☆ 
Filmmaking/Artistic:★★★★☆ 
Storytelling:★★★★☆ 

Really fun summer action movie. Chris Hemmerline does action and comedy both well, Natalie Portman is great. Anthony Hopkins is even decent (occasionally Sir Anthony can be a little hammy). The only thing Your Movie Monkey found a little funny was that the realm (planet) of bad guys was called Yodenheim (or Jodenheim or something). Every time Your Movie Monkey heard this, he thought it sounded like a mid-sized town that Borscht Belt comics knew well. (Oy, when you work Jodenheim, be sure to stop at Bubbie’s for a knisch!)

Your Movie Monkey was surprised it’s rated PG-13. He thinks the Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe was rated PG, and it was more violent. Alice in Wonderland was PG and it was way, way more violent. Very little language, and that was mild. No “adult situation”. Just a fun movie.  Your Movie Monkey took his 9 year old and had no issues with it.

Paul

January 15, 2012
By
 
Overall:★★★½☆ 
Filmmaking/Artistic:★★★½☆ 
Storytelling:★★★☆☆ 

Your Movie monkey is a huge fan of Simon Pegg and Nick Frost… so it’s not quite as good as Hot Fuzz or Shaun of the Dead.  But it’s a good time, especially after they get “warmed up” in the second half.  Jason Bateman almost steals the show.  Critics have said that the alien (Paul) was the funniest/best part, but Your Movie Monkey completely disagrees.  He’s kind of the straight man, and a little grumpy, and YMM is not a fan of Seth Rogen, at least not as much as the rest of the world is.  Too crude for kids, of course, as the R rating suggests.

Battle Los Angeles

January 15, 2012
By
 
Overall:★★½☆☆ 
Filmmaking/Artistic:★★★☆☆ 
Storytelling:★★☆☆☆ 

Exactly what you would expect.  Not a penny more, not a penny less.  Aliens invade.  A company of marine stereotypes goes out to fight them (the tough-as-nails older guy just about to retire, the green leader fresh out of school, the guy about to get married, the young guy everyone else has to look out for).  The aliens have superior technology, and of course there will be a string of defeats, until about 90 minutes in.  Still the acting is decent and stuff does blow up, so it’s not a complete waste of time.

The Adjustment Beaureau

January 15, 2012
By
 
Overall:★★½☆☆ 
Filmmaking/Artistic:★★★☆☆ 
Storytelling:★½☆☆☆ 

Well-acted but makes absolutely no sense.  Seriously, it’s Inception without being interesting.  Apparently “the chairman” (God?) wants Matt Damon or someone who looks and acts like Matt Damon to be president so he can install solar panels everywhere, but doesn’t want him to have his one true love for reasons that are seriously never explained.  God’s angels are the adjustment bureau, who wear magic hats that allow them to use New York doors as portals to other places (seems to plagiarize Monsters Inc..  There’s a hierarchy with the bureau that never, ever makes any sense.  And they operate both through magic or supernatural powers, and some funky 1966-Batman looking machines.  And they can stop time but not consistently.  Anyway, it’s just ok, wouldn’t recommend it unless you really like these particular actors.

The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader

January 15, 2012
By
 
Overall:★★★½☆ 
Filmmaking/Artistic:★★★★☆ 
Storytelling:★★★☆☆ 

So, I liked it, but not quite as much as the wife and kids (and mom) did.  Didn’t care for the addition of the “green mist” and the necessity to find the seven swords, or as I called them, “horcrux lite”.  Still a fan of the series, though.

It’s a mad, mad, mad, mad world: Alice In Wonderland (2010)

March 6, 2010
By

Overall Rating: B+
Filmmaking/Artistic: A
Storytelling: B−
MPAA Rating: PG (Some violence… Might be to scary/intense for children under 10)

The pitch

Let’s do the whole Charlie and The Chocolate Factory bit again with Alice in Wonderland.  Wouldn’t Johnny Depp be cool as the Mad Hatter?

Overview

A re-telling of an already surreal story, Alice In Wonderland is visually amazing, and the story moves along, although it does drag in places.  If you’re a Tim Burton / Johnny Depp / Helen Bonham Carter fan, you’ll like it a lot.  If you aren’t, this won’t be the movie where you change your mind.

Review

There’s really not much to say.  In this version of the story, Alice is 19, and is offered marriage to the son of her late father’s business partner.  We see in the flashbacks that the her dad was the kind of Hollywood dad that always dies before the movie starts, because he’s just too cool to survive.  (Like in Ever After.)  He’s wealthy and brilliant, and she is the love of his life and the heir to his good qualities.  And oh yes, he comforts her about her nightmares regarding a place with a blue caterpillar and tea-drinking rabbits.

Present time, dad has died, dad’s business partner has bough the business, and now wants his fop of a son to marry her.  Aa a party where everyone but Alice knows that her engagement is the point.  He proposes with everyone watching (although in this tale you can tell that the party guests, or at least their personality types, will re-appear in Wonderland a la The Wizard of Oz) , but Alice needs a moment to think, because this-is-what-everyone-wants-for-me-n0t-what-I-want rules the day.  So she sees and chases the white rabbit, falls down a whole and the familiar story starts.

Everyone in Underland keeps asking if she is the Alice, and she says no, but the other characters keep proving non-answers.  She runs into the standard characters, the red queen, the white queen, the mad hatter, etc., and the story is nice if predictable.

There’s no real reason to discuss the story any further.  The scenery and movie making is wonderful, and very Tim Burton, right down to the Danny Elfman music.  Helena Bonham Carter rocks as the evil red queen with a Barbara-Walters-esque speech impediment.  Johnny Depp, one of Your Movie Monkey’s favorites, is good but perhaps a bit over the top as the Mad Hatter.  (OK, it’s hard to explain how an unbelievably over-the-top character can be over-acted, but it does seem so.)  Relative newcomer Mia Wasikowska shines as Alice, not overly feminist and yet not willing to live with the status quo.  And the other character actors are also fantastic.

The story does drag in places, and although Your Movie Monkey is a huge Tim Burton fan, the one area where he falls down a bit is in the mixing of CGI and live action.  It just doesn’t seem seamless.  In Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, the opening scene in the chocolate factory with the chocolate river just looked like a movie set.  Here, it’s not quite as obvious, but there are times when the integration fails a bit.

If you are not a particular fan of Tim Burton, this one won’t make you change your mind.  But if you like it at all, it is an entertaining 2 hours of great effects and great acting.

The movie has some head lopping and threatened head lopping, and may be a bit scary for young kids.

Not technically plagiarisim: Percy Jackson / The Lightning Thief

February 14, 2010
By

Overall Rating: C+
Filmmaking/Artistic: B+
Storytelling: C−
MPAA Rating: PG (Mild language, indirect discussion of adult relationships)

The pitch

OK, how can we milk the Harry Potter machine some more?  I know… make Harry look like Zac Efron, make that pasty redhead into a streetwise African American kid, and have the smart girl like better looking… and a ninja!  And add  Greek mythology!  There’s no copyright on those monsters!

Overview

As a fan of the Harry Potter series, Your Movie Monkey found this to be really, really close.  The filmmaking is good, but the story feels a little familiar.  The movie style feels a little like the Hercules or Xena tv shows, but without the humorous self-awareness.  Still, kids will undoubtedly like it, and although it’s not great for adults, it’s not Space Chimps, either.

Review

Hmmm.  So, there’s this kid who finds out that he really belongs to a secret group people with special powers, which explains some of the strange happenings up until now in his life.  Up until now he’s been a loser in his life, but he finds out that he’s a hero in the new world.  He goes to a school for other kids with these special powers, and there learns from a very wise teacher.  He meets two other kids who will become his best friends and travel companions, a world-wise guy and a very smart girl.  He goes on a series of adventures to find magical objects that will allow him to fulfill a quest, which appears to be his destiny.  He has a famous father well known in this secret world.  Some of the kids at the school are on the side of good, and some evil.  Oh yes, and the kid can fly using a traditional fairytale instrument of flight.  Feel familiar, anyone?

Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief is based on a children’s book of the same name.   Your Movie Monkey’s older daughter Drama has read the book (and, in fact, most of the car trip back from the theater was spent discussing how the movie was not like the book, Dad).  Percy is played by Zac Efron look-alike Logan Lerman, who pulls off the role very well. 

The movie doesn’t begin with Percy, however, and instead starts off at the top of a skyscraper at 123 Backstory Lane, Zeus (uber-pasty uber-villain Sean Bean) tells Poseidon (Kevin McKidd)  that his lightning bolt’s been stolen (given Mr. Bean’s age, Your Commissioner was concerned that somehow Viagra was having a product placement).  We learn that Greek gods cannot steal each other’s powers, but their children can, and Zeus believes that Percy has stolen it.  Zeus threatens all out war if the lightning bolt is not returned by midnight in two weeks. 

Percy, meanwhile,  is a high school student with a strange form of dyslexia, where English words rearrange themselves into ancient Greek (and vice versa).  The only thing unusual about him is that he can sit underwater for periods of 7 minutes or more and feel refreshed.  Percy’s best buddy is Grover, a kid with crutches.  On a field trip, a substitute teacher calls Percy aside and, in an isolate room, turns into a monster and demands the lightning bolt.  Percy says basically “what?” but then Grove and his other teacher (a wheelchair-bound Pierce Brosnan) come in and kind of yell mythically at the creature who flies out the window.

Turns out, Grover is a satyr and Pierce Brosnan is a centaur, and Percy is the son of Poseidon.  They take Percy to a camp (although his mom is catpured by a minotaur along the way), where Percy will learn how to be a rockin’ demi-god.  Percy and Grover meet up with Annabeth, the butt-kicking ninja daughter of Athena.

The kids then set out on an adventure to get back Percy’s mom from Hades, and along the way meet all kinds of obstacles, including Uma Thurman’s wonderful Medusa, and some other famous characters from myths.

The movie feels a bit as if Hercules or Xena would feel if they didn’t laugh at themselves.  It has a serious tone, (except for Brandon T. Jackson as Grover, doing his best Chris Tucker impersonation… cracking streetwise, slightly effiminate, yet liking the ladies).   Chris Columbus, who directed the first two installments of the Harry Potter series, does a fine job implementing the story, but the material seems far inferior to Potter.  This seems like his skill… implementation. 

Both Lerman and Alexandra Daddario as Annabeth do great jobs as these characters.  It’s also good to see Catherine Keener in a kind of bread-and-butter role as Percy’s mom.  But overall, the story feels so familiar that there’s nothing really fresh and new.  Oh yes, and by the time we finally see the stolen lightning bolt, it has a kind of eco-friendly quality that doesn’t really fit with the story (like a smallish flourescent bulb). 

Overall, it’s probably worth taking the kids.  There are a few references to adult relationships (in Greek mythology, the gods often “hooked up”, as the movie says, with mortals.)  There is a little bit of mild swearing.  And there is definite violence, per the myths.  The scariness factor may make it inappropriate for kids under 10.  Also, Percy’s mom has a kind of lout of a husband, who isn’t positive, but still the family interaction isn’t great.  Still, it’s better than many, and the effects are quite good.

Archives

Critics
Critic ratings from
Audience ratings from