Sci-Fi

It’s a mad, mad, mad, mad world: Alice In Wonderland (2010)

March 6, 2010
By

Overall Rating: B+
Filmmaking/Artistic: A
Storytelling: B−
MPAA Rating: PG (Some violence… Might be to scary/intense for children under 10)

The pitch

Let’s do the whole Charlie and The Chocolate Factory bit again with Alice in Wonderland.  Wouldn’t Johnny Depp be cool as the Mad Hatter?

Overview

A re-telling of an already surreal story, Alice In Wonderland is visually amazing, and the story moves along, although it does drag in places.  If you’re a Tim Burton / Johnny Depp / Helen Bonham Carter fan, you’ll like it a lot.  If you aren’t, this won’t be the movie where you change your mind.

Review

There’s really not much to say.  In this version of the story, Alice is 19, and is offered marriage to the son of her late father’s business partner.  We see in the flashbacks that the her dad was the kind of Hollywood dad that always dies before the movie starts, because he’s just too cool to survive.  (Like in Ever After.)  He’s wealthy and brilliant, and she is the love of his life and the heir to his good qualities.  And oh yes, he comforts her about her nightmares regarding a place with a blue caterpillar and tea-drinking rabbits.

Present time, dad has died, dad’s business partner has bough the business, and now wants his fop of a son to marry her.  Aa a party where everyone but Alice knows that her engagement is the point.  He proposes with everyone watching (although in this tale you can tell that the party guests, or at least their personality types, will re-appear in Wonderland a la The Wizard of Oz) , but Alice needs a moment to think, because this-is-what-everyone-wants-for-me-n0t-what-I-want rules the day.  So she sees and chases the white rabbit, falls down a whole and the familiar story starts.

Everyone in Underland keeps asking if she is the Alice, and she says no, but the other characters keep proving non-answers.  She runs into the standard characters, the red queen, the white queen, the mad hatter, etc., and the story is nice if predictable.

There’s no real reason to discuss the story any further.  The scenery and movie making is wonderful, and very Tim Burton, right down to the Danny Elfman music.  Helena Bonham Carter rocks as the evil red queen with a Barbara-Walters-esque speech impediment.  Johnny Depp, one of Your Movie Monkey’s favorites, is good but perhaps a bit over the top as the Mad Hatter.  (OK, it’s hard to explain how an unbelievably over-the-top character can be over-acted, but it does seem so.)  Relative newcomer Mia Wasikowska shines as Alice, not overly feminist and yet not willing to live with the status quo.  And the other character actors are also fantastic.

The story does drag in places, and although Your Movie Monkey is a huge Tim Burton fan, the one area where he falls down a bit is in the mixing of CGI and live action.  It just doesn’t seem seamless.  In Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, the opening scene in the chocolate factory with the chocolate river just looked like a movie set.  Here, it’s not quite as obvious, but there are times when the integration fails a bit.

If you are not a particular fan of Tim Burton, this one won’t make you change your mind.  But if you like it at all, it is an entertaining 2 hours of great effects and great acting.

The movie has some head lopping and threatened head lopping, and may be a bit scary for young kids.

Not technically plagiarisim: Percy Jackson / The Lightning Thief

February 14, 2010
By

Overall Rating: C+
Filmmaking/Artistic: B+
Storytelling: C−
MPAA Rating: PG (Mild language, indirect discussion of adult relationships)

The pitch

OK, how can we milk the Harry Potter machine some more?  I know… make Harry look like Zac Efron, make that pasty redhead into a streetwise African American kid, and have the smart girl like better looking… and a ninja!  And add  Greek mythology!  There’s no copyright on those monsters!

Overview

As a fan of the Harry Potter series, Your Movie Monkey found this to be really, really close.  The filmmaking is good, but the story feels a little familiar.  The movie style feels a little like the Hercules or Xena tv shows, but without the humorous self-awareness.  Still, kids will undoubtedly like it, and although it’s not great for adults, it’s not Space Chimps, either.

Review

Hmmm.  So, there’s this kid who finds out that he really belongs to a secret group people with special powers, which explains some of the strange happenings up until now in his life.  Up until now he’s been a loser in his life, but he finds out that he’s a hero in the new world.  He goes to a school for other kids with these special powers, and there learns from a very wise teacher.  He meets two other kids who will become his best friends and travel companions, a world-wise guy and a very smart girl.  He goes on a series of adventures to find magical objects that will allow him to fulfill a quest, which appears to be his destiny.  He has a famous father well known in this secret world.  Some of the kids at the school are on the side of good, and some evil.  Oh yes, and the kid can fly using a traditional fairytale instrument of flight.  Feel familiar, anyone?

Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief is based on a children’s book of the same name.   Your Movie Monkey’s older daughter Drama has read the book (and, in fact, most of the car trip back from the theater was spent discussing how the movie was not like the book, Dad).  Percy is played by Zac Efron look-alike Logan Lerman, who pulls off the role very well. 

The movie doesn’t begin with Percy, however, and instead starts off at the top of a skyscraper at 123 Backstory Lane, Zeus (uber-pasty uber-villain Sean Bean) tells Poseidon (Kevin McKidd)  that his lightning bolt’s been stolen (given Mr. Bean’s age, Your Commissioner was concerned that somehow Viagra was having a product placement).  We learn that Greek gods cannot steal each other’s powers, but their children can, and Zeus believes that Percy has stolen it.  Zeus threatens all out war if the lightning bolt is not returned by midnight in two weeks. 

Percy, meanwhile,  is a high school student with a strange form of dyslexia, where English words rearrange themselves into ancient Greek (and vice versa).  The only thing unusual about him is that he can sit underwater for periods of 7 minutes or more and feel refreshed.  Percy’s best buddy is Grover, a kid with crutches.  On a field trip, a substitute teacher calls Percy aside and, in an isolate room, turns into a monster and demands the lightning bolt.  Percy says basically “what?” but then Grove and his other teacher (a wheelchair-bound Pierce Brosnan) come in and kind of yell mythically at the creature who flies out the window.

Turns out, Grover is a satyr and Pierce Brosnan is a centaur, and Percy is the son of Poseidon.  They take Percy to a camp (although his mom is catpured by a minotaur along the way), where Percy will learn how to be a rockin’ demi-god.  Percy and Grover meet up with Annabeth, the butt-kicking ninja daughter of Athena.

The kids then set out on an adventure to get back Percy’s mom from Hades, and along the way meet all kinds of obstacles, including Uma Thurman’s wonderful Medusa, and some other famous characters from myths.

The movie feels a bit as if Hercules or Xena would feel if they didn’t laugh at themselves.  It has a serious tone, (except for Brandon T. Jackson as Grover, doing his best Chris Tucker impersonation… cracking streetwise, slightly effiminate, yet liking the ladies).   Chris Columbus, who directed the first two installments of the Harry Potter series, does a fine job implementing the story, but the material seems far inferior to Potter.  This seems like his skill… implementation. 

Both Lerman and Alexandra Daddario as Annabeth do great jobs as these characters.  It’s also good to see Catherine Keener in a kind of bread-and-butter role as Percy’s mom.  But overall, the story feels so familiar that there’s nothing really fresh and new.  Oh yes, and by the time we finally see the stolen lightning bolt, it has a kind of eco-friendly quality that doesn’t really fit with the story (like a smallish flourescent bulb). 

Overall, it’s probably worth taking the kids.  There are a few references to adult relationships (in Greek mythology, the gods often “hooked up”, as the movie says, with mortals.)  There is a little bit of mild swearing.  And there is definite violence, per the myths.  The scariness factor may make it inappropriate for kids under 10.  Also, Percy’s mom has a kind of lout of a husband, who isn’t positive, but still the family interaction isn’t great.  Still, it’s better than many, and the effects are quite good.

An undead romp: Zombieland

February 14, 2010
By

Overall Rating: B+
Filmmaking/Artistic: B+
Storytelling: A−
MPAA Rating: R (Zombie violence, Some language)

The pitch

What if we did Shaun of the Deadwith Woody Harrleson as the “funny guy”, and added a Napoleon Dynamite loser to it?

Overview

A well-done zombie comedy, with enough anti-zombie violence for the action fans and plenty of loser comedy.  The very funny script even makes the 90 minutes of Woody Harrleson shtick acceptable.

Review

Your Movie Monkey heard from multiple sources that this was great, and it did not disappoint.  The world has been taken over by zombies, and there are very few survivors left.  The movie focuses on one Napoleon Dynamite type loser, Columbus (Jesse Eisenberg), who is trying to get to his family (in Columbus, Ohio… everyone is known by the town they’re from in this film).  He explains to us how he survives, basically he has a set of rules he lives his life by.  (Example: Rule #1, Cardio.  You’ve got to be able to outrun the Zombies.)

We get to know Columbus throughout this movie, as he becomes more alive in his quest to survive than he ever was before the invasion.  Columbus hooks up with Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson), who basically just loves shooting zombies.  Tallahassee has suffered a big loss, and basically doesn’t care about anything else.

It’s the script that’s really funny… constant reminders of the rules.  Nothing much actually happens in the film, but the adventures along the way are worth it.  Your Movie Monkey’s hesitancy was the idea of watching Woody Harrleson for an entire movie.  (He’s funny in small doses, but 90 minutes?)  But the writing is so good, that it’s even worth it.  A lot of fun and laughs, and not too deep, Zombieland is definitely worth a rental, if you like the genre. 

Your Movie Monkey, who can’t deal with horror films or with gangster films very well, found this one easy enough because the zombies are so clearly not real, it’s a complete fantasy.  Some may find it too violent, but those who would probably don’t need this review to help decide.

It’s rated R for some language and for violence.  Definitely not for young kids.

Fly Me to Joburg: District 9

August 22, 2009
By

Overall Rating: A−
Filmmaking/Artistic: A+
Storytelling: B
MPAA Rating: R

The pitch

Imagine that The Fly had an alien friend to guide his transformation (like the alien in Enemy Mine), and could turn into a Transformer to protect his buddies from an evil corporation, and that it was all set in South Africa for that “socially conscious” thing.  And imagine Peter Jackson lent us his name.

Overview

Although Peter Jackson’s name is attached, it’s really an unknown director shooting a very interesting mix of mockumentary and sci/fi action with moral undertones that hit close to home, especially since the film is set in Johannesberg.  Brilliantly acted, at times moving, the film occasionally seems like bits and pieces of other movies (so not quite as groundbreaking as reviews would have you belive), but overall it’s well worth seeing.  Way too violent for those who are squeamish, and definitely not appropriate for those under 14.

Review notes

A departure from typical summer fare, District 9 is an interesting take on familiar themes.  A giant spaceship began to hover over Johannesburg 20 years ago, and after a period of inaction, officials cut into it and found these aliens who were malnourished.  The aliens, who are called “prawns” due to their crustacean appearnce, were herded off into a ghetto called District 9.  But over the course of time (as would be expected with a million aliens in a ghetto) tensions rose, and the movie really begins, in mockumentary style, with the resettling of the prawns to a new (and far worse) area called District 10.

The resettlment is under the control of MNU, the archetypical evil corporation.  The main character, Wikus Van der Merwe (Sharlto Copley), is selected by his company to be in charge of the resettlement.  The prawns have “rights” (in name only), and must agree to the resettlement, but it’s a farce, because MNU can kill them if they refuse to give their permission.

During the resettling procedure, which is broadcast round the world on through CNN-esque organizations, Wikus is “infected” with an alien substance, and begins to transform into a prawn.  At which point, MNU’s nefarious schemes become quite clear, and poor Wikus becomes the target of lies as he tries to escape from MNU.

Along the way, Wikus is befriended by a fairly smart prawn named “Christopher”, who has goals of his own.

The action part of the movie unfolds along fairly standard, but still interesting lines.  But the theme of the movie that makes it so interesting is that Wikus’s evolution in thinking about the prawns.   In the beginning, as he finds an “unauthorized” prawn eggs, he laughs as they are set on fire, describing with amusement to the camera how these little ones “pop like popcorn” while being destroyed.  But he becomes more sympathetic when he himself becomes victim to the same treatment he was dishing out.

The movie is more complicated than the review indicates, but it’s well worth watching.  The obvious Apartheid metaphor is well done, always in the background but never so overpowering as to seem stilted.  The theme of the movie is universal: the inhumanity and depravity humans have inflicted on each other, once one group decides that another group is somehow “less than human”.  True, in the movie, the prawns are non-human.  But they are sentient, intelligent, and clearly have come from a place with better technology than on earth.

It’s also interesting how the space ship hovers above the city constantly throughout the movie.  It’s like the problem of racisim… it’s always there, even if you try to shove it in a corner.

Copley, who apparently is new to acting, does a brilliant job as Wikus.  He carries the entire movie, and is incredibly believable. 

Your Movie Monkey did have a few quibbles.  First, in Hollywood Code, there is no greater evil than the corporation.  In this film, the corporation was willing to remove a man’s heart (live) for their own profit motive.  It seems universally true.  About half the crimes on Law and Order, at least when The Monkey was watching it, were driven by coroporate greed.  (And drug companies… their CEOs are always ridiculously portrayed as being willing to sacrifice innocent lives to make money.  Ridiculous!)  Even the ridiculous movie Bulworth, which has Warren Beatty pantsing around to run for political office, even doing things like rap, has an evil corporation kill him because his ideas were becoming too popular.   District 9 is no exception to the “corporations are evil” bandwagon.  It’s just, at this point, a very hackneyed theme.

Second, Wikus’s transformation into a prawn was very, very reminiscent of The Fly.  Losing fingernails, losing teeth, etc., it all felt a little familiar. 

But overall, despite a somewhat slow first half, the movie is fantastic.  It is violent, and the treatment of the prawns is very disturbing, but the theme is universal, and the action is well worth the monkey’s few complaints.

“Lost” in Space: Star Trek

May 10, 2009
By

Overall Rating: A
Filmmaking/Artistic: A+
Storytelling: A
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

Clearly the best Star Trek movie ever made, this movie is a stand out, for both fans and non-fans of the original late 60′s series.  JJ Abrams, the wizard behind the TV show Lost, skillfully combines action, humor, and character development in this two hour thrill ride.

Full Review

First, the biases.  Your Movie Monkey is a fan of the original Star Trek series, and a fan of Lost, the brainchild of JJ Abrams, who directs this movie.  But Your Movie Monkey saw the film in the company of 9 other people, some of whom were not fans of neither, and all found it riveting. 

The film opens with the birth of James Kirk… but, in true JJ Abrams fashion, in a way that is both contradictory to, and consistent with, the original series.  For those other Lost fans out there, one can immediately feel the pleasant familiarity of  what you like about the TV series… the emotion mixed with action, the camera shots, everything.

This particular film depicts Kirk as a rebellious kid, who ends up joining StarFleet after a barfight with new recruits.  Brilliantly acted by Chris Pine, Kirk is a believable version of the overacted character we all know from Shatner.  Smarmy and sarcastic, possessing all of Kirk’s confidence without the distracting method acting pregnant pauses, Pine portrays a street smart fighter, overconfident with youth, yet clearly leader material.

At the academy we meet the younger versions of Dr. McCoy, Uhura, and the (in)famous green girl.  We also learn more about the backstory of Spock, as he grew up to the prejudice of being of mixed race, even on logical Vulcan.  Captain Pike (of the one-vs-two blink full body wheelchair for those of you familiar with the original series) also plays a good role in the film, and we get to know the young Sulu, Chekov, and (although not nearly as young) Scotty.

The magic of the movie is how it references the old films, but not in a corny way, while being completely unique.  The action makes the story interesting, and the “sci fi” elements are present, but not overwhelming (no takion fileds, Krieger waves, etc.)  It’s easy to follow, and yet Abrams gives us plenty of reason to be in suspense, because, for reasons Your Movie Monkey won’t give away, it is not guaranteed that any of the film’s characters will survive.  (Think Lost, but not so complicated, and no smoke monster.) 

There’s no real sense in describing the story here.  It’s not a terribly original storyline, but it doesn’t matter, because characters and action drive the movie.  Fans of action type shows will likely love it, as will fans of the original series, and pretty much movie fans everywhere.  The acting is fantastic, (Simon Pegg absolutely steals all scenes as Scotty), for the most part better than the original, and the story keeps you intrigued for the entire two hours.   Even Eric Bana is, for the most part, tolerable.  (The weakest link for sure, but it won’t be too distracting.)

Your Movie Monkey hasn’t gone into as much detail as he usually would, but thinks you should see it for yourself.

In terms of objectionable material, if they cut maybe 40 seconds, it could be PG instead of PG-13.   Some brief objectionable language, and a brief “adult situation” render this show inappropriate for kids under 13, at least IYMMHO. 

Your Movie Monkey hopes that those of you who see it will truly enjoy this nice opening to the summer action season.

Great acting.  Great

Pouty Teenage Troubles: Twilight

March 29, 2009
By

Overall Rating: D
Filmmaking/Artistic: F
Storytelling: C+
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

Unbelievably cheesy special effects, a very unsympathetic main character (acted poorly), a very brooding vampire (think James Dean with mousse and lots of lipstick), and MTV-productions level of poutiness make this movie very, very difficult to watch, especially if you’re not a girl.

Full Review

Your Movie Monkey saw this in the only venue where he would consider seeing it–while held hostage on a long overseas flight.  The Monkey is actually somewhat fond of vampire movies for what they represent.  They are often morality tales, where the victim must “give in to temptation” before being attacked.  Further, vampire movies (unlike, say, mob movies) are clearly fictional, and thus are more set up to tell a story with a moral.

Your Movie Monkey’s wife Beaudelaire is quite fond of the hit series by Stephanie Meyer, as are several other (exclusively female) friends, so while trapped on the plane, it seemed fine enough to test out.  Oy.

The main character is Bella, who is (as are almost all characters in this film except maybe the main vampire) an extreme Hollywood cliche.  She is a child of divorced parents with this cool mom who calls her up on her cell to dish about boys.  She has gone for some reason to live with her father in a town in the Northwest  (called Forks, WA, which made Your Movie Monkey want to do a whole new series set in a poor rural Texas town called Sporks), because she wants to give said cool mom the chance to motorcycle around the country with her new boyfriend, or something.  Or, more likely, because she is a morose teenager who needs more people to consume with her self-indulgent Angst. 

Bella moves in with her dad, and immediately lets him know that there is nothing he can do to make up for the fact that she hasn’t seen him in many years, and she would also like hot meals, but please not at the diner like you’ve been doing for years, thanks, dad.  (Bella is without a doubt the most unsympathetic heroine Your Movie Monkey has seen in a long time.  She’s like the Meryl Streep character in Doubt, without the humor.)  The dad is the beloved and wise-yet-simple town cop in Forks, who eats every day at the diner and knows people named Flossy. 

Dad is also best buddies with a person who is Hollywood Code for the wisest human being on earth, a Native American in a wheel chair.  This relationship become relevant because the son of the guy in the wheelchair knows Bella (but goes to school on the Res, so won’t see her much) from previous visits in Bella’s childhood, and he ends up telling her that he is descended from wolves, and wolves for some reason can see vampires for what they are, when not busy howling and marking their territory.

Anyway, Dad gifts Bella a truck (and Your Movie Monkey is sure that the inevitable complaint from Bella about the environmental consequences of a non-hybrid were thankfully edited out), and she rolls in it to The Forks WA High School for The Undead and Really Old Hollywood Cliches.  She is greeted by this Asian guy who looks like Onch and who proclaims himself to ”rule the school”.  There are also Breakfast-Club/High-School-Musical groups of kids who don’t get along with each other.

And then, there’s Edward Cullen.  Edward Cullen is, of course, the vampire, and he looks like, well, imagine you had a magazine geared at men (GQ or whatever), and you took out one of those cologne ads that has a skinny, completely shaven model in a speedo sitting at the base of a really expensive pool or perhaps alpine lake.  Now take that model and add quite a bit of lipstick, a quart and a half olf hair gel, and camera angles from any director who cut his teeth at MTV.   That’s what Edward Cullen looks like in this movie.

Edward apparently is part of a strange “family” who live in isolation, mostly so they can spend time slicking back each others’ hair.  Edward ignores Bella, despite being assigned as her “lab partner”, and will occasionally not show up for school.  But it’s clear he likes her, enough that he uses his super strength to prevent a wayward car from hitting her.  (The special effect here looks like he is doing a Vulcan mind meld with the car.  Your Movie Monkey half expected to hear him say “Your Thoughts are My Thoughts, Your Gears are My Gears” to the car.) 

The special effects are quite a problem with this movie, in that they make almost no sense.  So Edward is super strong, fine, but somehow this hurling mass of metal stops comes to a complete stop and gets a smallish dent like a fender bender.  Apparently vampires change all laws of physics as we know them.  In fact, later, in one of the cheesier moments of the movie, Bella visits the vampire family, and after chatting and giggling about how hard it was not to kill her and drink her blood, they take her out for a game of vampire baseball, because vampires, you see, hit the ball so hard that it would sound like a lightning strike to the people in the village below

So Edward and Bella strike up a relationship, mostly with Bella being condescening and morose, and Edward driven by a desire to harm her.  Edward does take her home to “meet the family” as previously described, and they all have slick backed hair and love art, and cook some dinner just for her.  Edward explains (and this was an interesting potshot at vegetarians), that they drink animal blood, but just like you can never really be satisfied with tofu, the desire for human blood was overwhelmingly strong.

During this trip, Edward shows her why they don’t go out into the sunlight.  Apparently in the book, it was because their skin glittered like diamonds, and people would figure out who they were.  In the movie, when Edward removes his shirt to explain the sunlight thing, it may have been the screen on the plane, but Your Movie Monkey thought “You don’t go out into the sunlight because you’re pasty and British?”

Oh yes, and something else we learn in this trip to the family.  Vampires can fly.  Not run fast, like in the book (according to Beaudeliare).  We’re talking “Bella, grab my neck”, a hand outstretched like Zan and Jana calling on the Wondertwin Powers, and a slow, cheesy liftoff to fly to the tops of some trees.

So, at one trip to the vamipre family, they run into a distinctly non-vegetarian group of vampires who decide they want to hunt Bella for sport, and there’s a whole lot of Angst over whose fault it all is, and the bad vampires almost get Bella, but (darn the luck), Edward saves her.  Interestingly, the bad vampire James has bitter her, and so Edward must “suck out the poison” (this is how vampires make new vampires… biting but not sucking the blood out to the point of death), and this requires this extraordinary amount of control, because as Edward has said, it is very dangerous to be around him.  (Who would have thought “cut and suck” would make such a comeback after being discredited as a snakebite cure?)

This brings up one thematic element of the movie that was quite troublesome to Your Movie Monkey.  Throughout, Edward is constantly warning Bella how hard it is for him to control himself (i.e., not kill her for her blood), and how dangerous it is to be around him, but Bella says she doesn’t care (after all, she can be morose with him her whole life and he won’t grow a day older for it!)  This seemed strangely like women who stay with abusive partners… he can’t help himself, it’s probably my fault.  Hopefully this wasn’t what was intended, but it sure seemed like that message was there.

Overall, probably the best part of the film was Robert Pattinson, who played Edward.  He cannot help the clunky, cliched direction and the leading actress whose acting was so horrific.  (A scene where he tells her that he is leaving so she won’t be threatened receives from her a ”Hey wha don’t wha hey how why wha” scene reminiscent, at best, of Uncle Buck.)   He did the best with what he was given.

The story did have some interest, in that it dreamed this world of vampires with its own mythology and reasoning.  And in the end, there was some action.  But overall, it was cheesy, with bad direction and mostly bad acting.

The one part Your Movie Monkey did like, well one line, actually, had to do with the morality play aspect of the story.  Edward explains to Bella that “every part about me draws you in…. my looks, my hair, my smell.  Not that I’d need any of that.  I’m the perfect killing machine.”  Your Movie Monkey is reminded, at least in small part, of what his daughters will face as they mature and begin to date.  Every part of these guys will draw them in.  They must be very, very careful.  Especially if one of them can fly. 

Archives

Critics
Marvel's The Avengers93%
Dark Shadows42%
Think Like a Man51%
The Hunger Games84%
The Lucky One20%
The Five-Year Engagement63%
The Pirates! Band of Misfits86%
The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel76%
Chimpanzee74%
Safe55%
Critic ratings from
Audience ratings from