All YMM Reviews

Fly Me to Joburg: District 9

August 22, 2009
By

Overall Rating: A−
Filmmaking/Artistic: A+
Storytelling: B
MPAA Rating: R

The pitch

Imagine that The Fly had an alien friend to guide his transformation (like the alien in Enemy Mine), and could turn into a Transformer to protect his buddies from an evil corporation, and that it was all set in South Africa for that “socially conscious” thing.  And imagine Peter Jackson lent us his name.

Overview

Although Peter Jackson’s name is attached, it’s really an unknown director shooting a very interesting mix of mockumentary and sci/fi action with moral undertones that hit close to home, especially since the film is set in Johannesberg.  Brilliantly acted, at times moving, the film occasionally seems like bits and pieces of other movies (so not quite as groundbreaking as reviews would have you belive), but overall it’s well worth seeing.  Way too violent for those who are squeamish, and definitely not appropriate for those under 14.

Review notes

A departure from typical summer fare, District 9 is an interesting take on familiar themes.  A giant spaceship began to hover over Johannesburg 20 years ago, and after a period of inaction, officials cut into it and found these aliens who were malnourished.  The aliens, who are called “prawns” due to their crustacean appearnce, were herded off into a ghetto called District 9.  But over the course of time (as would be expected with a million aliens in a ghetto) tensions rose, and the movie really begins, in mockumentary style, with the resettling of the prawns to a new (and far worse) area called District 10.

The resettlment is under the control of MNU, the archetypical evil corporation.  The main character, Wikus Van der Merwe (Sharlto Copley), is selected by his company to be in charge of the resettlement.  The prawns have “rights” (in name only), and must agree to the resettlement, but it’s a farce, because MNU can kill them if they refuse to give their permission.

During the resettling procedure, which is broadcast round the world on through CNN-esque organizations, Wikus is “infected” with an alien substance, and begins to transform into a prawn.  At which point, MNU’s nefarious schemes become quite clear, and poor Wikus becomes the target of lies as he tries to escape from MNU.

Along the way, Wikus is befriended by a fairly smart prawn named “Christopher”, who has goals of his own.

The action part of the movie unfolds along fairly standard, but still interesting lines.  But the theme of the movie that makes it so interesting is that Wikus’s evolution in thinking about the prawns.   In the beginning, as he finds an “unauthorized” prawn eggs, he laughs as they are set on fire, describing with amusement to the camera how these little ones “pop like popcorn” while being destroyed.  But he becomes more sympathetic when he himself becomes victim to the same treatment he was dishing out.

The movie is more complicated than the review indicates, but it’s well worth watching.  The obvious Apartheid metaphor is well done, always in the background but never so overpowering as to seem stilted.  The theme of the movie is universal: the inhumanity and depravity humans have inflicted on each other, once one group decides that another group is somehow “less than human”.  True, in the movie, the prawns are non-human.  But they are sentient, intelligent, and clearly have come from a place with better technology than on earth.

It’s also interesting how the space ship hovers above the city constantly throughout the movie.  It’s like the problem of racisim… it’s always there, even if you try to shove it in a corner.

Copley, who apparently is new to acting, does a brilliant job as Wikus.  He carries the entire movie, and is incredibly believable. 

Your Movie Monkey did have a few quibbles.  First, in Hollywood Code, there is no greater evil than the corporation.  In this film, the corporation was willing to remove a man’s heart (live) for their own profit motive.  It seems universally true.  About half the crimes on Law and Order, at least when The Monkey was watching it, were driven by coroporate greed.  (And drug companies… their CEOs are always ridiculously portrayed as being willing to sacrifice innocent lives to make money.  Ridiculous!)  Even the ridiculous movie Bulworth, which has Warren Beatty pantsing around to run for political office, even doing things like rap, has an evil corporation kill him because his ideas were becoming too popular.   District 9 is no exception to the “corporations are evil” bandwagon.  It’s just, at this point, a very hackneyed theme.

Second, Wikus’s transformation into a prawn was very, very reminiscent of The Fly.  Losing fingernails, losing teeth, etc., it all felt a little familiar. 

But overall, despite a somewhat slow first half, the movie is fantastic.  It is violent, and the treatment of the prawns is very disturbing, but the theme is universal, and the action is well worth the monkey’s few complaints.

“Lost” in Space: Star Trek

May 10, 2009
By

Overall Rating: A
Filmmaking/Artistic: A+
Storytelling: A
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

Clearly the best Star Trek movie ever made, this movie is a stand out, for both fans and non-fans of the original late 60′s series.  JJ Abrams, the wizard behind the TV show Lost, skillfully combines action, humor, and character development in this two hour thrill ride.

Full Review

First, the biases.  Your Movie Monkey is a fan of the original Star Trek series, and a fan of Lost, the brainchild of JJ Abrams, who directs this movie.  But Your Movie Monkey saw the film in the company of 9 other people, some of whom were not fans of neither, and all found it riveting. 

The film opens with the birth of James Kirk… but, in true JJ Abrams fashion, in a way that is both contradictory to, and consistent with, the original series.  For those other Lost fans out there, one can immediately feel the pleasant familiarity of  what you like about the TV series… the emotion mixed with action, the camera shots, everything.

This particular film depicts Kirk as a rebellious kid, who ends up joining StarFleet after a barfight with new recruits.  Brilliantly acted by Chris Pine, Kirk is a believable version of the overacted character we all know from Shatner.  Smarmy and sarcastic, possessing all of Kirk’s confidence without the distracting method acting pregnant pauses, Pine portrays a street smart fighter, overconfident with youth, yet clearly leader material.

At the academy we meet the younger versions of Dr. McCoy, Uhura, and the (in)famous green girl.  We also learn more about the backstory of Spock, as he grew up to the prejudice of being of mixed race, even on logical Vulcan.  Captain Pike (of the one-vs-two blink full body wheelchair for those of you familiar with the original series) also plays a good role in the film, and we get to know the young Sulu, Chekov, and (although not nearly as young) Scotty.

The magic of the movie is how it references the old films, but not in a corny way, while being completely unique.  The action makes the story interesting, and the “sci fi” elements are present, but not overwhelming (no takion fileds, Krieger waves, etc.)  It’s easy to follow, and yet Abrams gives us plenty of reason to be in suspense, because, for reasons Your Movie Monkey won’t give away, it is not guaranteed that any of the film’s characters will survive.  (Think Lost, but not so complicated, and no smoke monster.) 

There’s no real sense in describing the story here.  It’s not a terribly original storyline, but it doesn’t matter, because characters and action drive the movie.  Fans of action type shows will likely love it, as will fans of the original series, and pretty much movie fans everywhere.  The acting is fantastic, (Simon Pegg absolutely steals all scenes as Scotty), for the most part better than the original, and the story keeps you intrigued for the entire two hours.   Even Eric Bana is, for the most part, tolerable.  (The weakest link for sure, but it won’t be too distracting.)

Your Movie Monkey hasn’t gone into as much detail as he usually would, but thinks you should see it for yourself.

In terms of objectionable material, if they cut maybe 40 seconds, it could be PG instead of PG-13.   Some brief objectionable language, and a brief “adult situation” render this show inappropriate for kids under 13, at least IYMMHO. 

Your Movie Monkey hopes that those of you who see it will truly enjoy this nice opening to the summer action season.

Great acting.  Great

Pouty Teenage Troubles: Twilight

March 29, 2009
By

Overall Rating: D
Filmmaking/Artistic: F
Storytelling: C+
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

Unbelievably cheesy special effects, a very unsympathetic main character (acted poorly), a very brooding vampire (think James Dean with mousse and lots of lipstick), and MTV-productions level of poutiness make this movie very, very difficult to watch, especially if you’re not a girl.

Full Review

Your Movie Monkey saw this in the only venue where he would consider seeing it–while held hostage on a long overseas flight.  The Monkey is actually somewhat fond of vampire movies for what they represent.  They are often morality tales, where the victim must “give in to temptation” before being attacked.  Further, vampire movies (unlike, say, mob movies) are clearly fictional, and thus are more set up to tell a story with a moral.

Your Movie Monkey’s wife Beaudelaire is quite fond of the hit series by Stephanie Meyer, as are several other (exclusively female) friends, so while trapped on the plane, it seemed fine enough to test out.  Oy.

The main character is Bella, who is (as are almost all characters in this film except maybe the main vampire) an extreme Hollywood cliche.  She is a child of divorced parents with this cool mom who calls her up on her cell to dish about boys.  She has gone for some reason to live with her father in a town in the Northwest  (called Forks, WA, which made Your Movie Monkey want to do a whole new series set in a poor rural Texas town called Sporks), because she wants to give said cool mom the chance to motorcycle around the country with her new boyfriend, or something.  Or, more likely, because she is a morose teenager who needs more people to consume with her self-indulgent Angst. 

Bella moves in with her dad, and immediately lets him know that there is nothing he can do to make up for the fact that she hasn’t seen him in many years, and she would also like hot meals, but please not at the diner like you’ve been doing for years, thanks, dad.  (Bella is without a doubt the most unsympathetic heroine Your Movie Monkey has seen in a long time.  She’s like the Meryl Streep character in Doubt, without the humor.)  The dad is the beloved and wise-yet-simple town cop in Forks, who eats every day at the diner and knows people named Flossy. 

Dad is also best buddies with a person who is Hollywood Code for the wisest human being on earth, a Native American in a wheel chair.  This relationship become relevant because the son of the guy in the wheelchair knows Bella (but goes to school on the Res, so won’t see her much) from previous visits in Bella’s childhood, and he ends up telling her that he is descended from wolves, and wolves for some reason can see vampires for what they are, when not busy howling and marking their territory.

Anyway, Dad gifts Bella a truck (and Your Movie Monkey is sure that the inevitable complaint from Bella about the environmental consequences of a non-hybrid were thankfully edited out), and she rolls in it to The Forks WA High School for The Undead and Really Old Hollywood Cliches.  She is greeted by this Asian guy who looks like Onch and who proclaims himself to ”rule the school”.  There are also Breakfast-Club/High-School-Musical groups of kids who don’t get along with each other.

And then, there’s Edward Cullen.  Edward Cullen is, of course, the vampire, and he looks like, well, imagine you had a magazine geared at men (GQ or whatever), and you took out one of those cologne ads that has a skinny, completely shaven model in a speedo sitting at the base of a really expensive pool or perhaps alpine lake.  Now take that model and add quite a bit of lipstick, a quart and a half olf hair gel, and camera angles from any director who cut his teeth at MTV.   That’s what Edward Cullen looks like in this movie.

Edward apparently is part of a strange “family” who live in isolation, mostly so they can spend time slicking back each others’ hair.  Edward ignores Bella, despite being assigned as her “lab partner”, and will occasionally not show up for school.  But it’s clear he likes her, enough that he uses his super strength to prevent a wayward car from hitting her.  (The special effect here looks like he is doing a Vulcan mind meld with the car.  Your Movie Monkey half expected to hear him say “Your Thoughts are My Thoughts, Your Gears are My Gears” to the car.) 

The special effects are quite a problem with this movie, in that they make almost no sense.  So Edward is super strong, fine, but somehow this hurling mass of metal stops comes to a complete stop and gets a smallish dent like a fender bender.  Apparently vampires change all laws of physics as we know them.  In fact, later, in one of the cheesier moments of the movie, Bella visits the vampire family, and after chatting and giggling about how hard it was not to kill her and drink her blood, they take her out for a game of vampire baseball, because vampires, you see, hit the ball so hard that it would sound like a lightning strike to the people in the village below

So Edward and Bella strike up a relationship, mostly with Bella being condescening and morose, and Edward driven by a desire to harm her.  Edward does take her home to “meet the family” as previously described, and they all have slick backed hair and love art, and cook some dinner just for her.  Edward explains (and this was an interesting potshot at vegetarians), that they drink animal blood, but just like you can never really be satisfied with tofu, the desire for human blood was overwhelmingly strong.

During this trip, Edward shows her why they don’t go out into the sunlight.  Apparently in the book, it was because their skin glittered like diamonds, and people would figure out who they were.  In the movie, when Edward removes his shirt to explain the sunlight thing, it may have been the screen on the plane, but Your Movie Monkey thought “You don’t go out into the sunlight because you’re pasty and British?”

Oh yes, and something else we learn in this trip to the family.  Vampires can fly.  Not run fast, like in the book (according to Beaudeliare).  We’re talking “Bella, grab my neck”, a hand outstretched like Zan and Jana calling on the Wondertwin Powers, and a slow, cheesy liftoff to fly to the tops of some trees.

So, at one trip to the vamipre family, they run into a distinctly non-vegetarian group of vampires who decide they want to hunt Bella for sport, and there’s a whole lot of Angst over whose fault it all is, and the bad vampires almost get Bella, but (darn the luck), Edward saves her.  Interestingly, the bad vampire James has bitter her, and so Edward must “suck out the poison” (this is how vampires make new vampires… biting but not sucking the blood out to the point of death), and this requires this extraordinary amount of control, because as Edward has said, it is very dangerous to be around him.  (Who would have thought “cut and suck” would make such a comeback after being discredited as a snakebite cure?)

This brings up one thematic element of the movie that was quite troublesome to Your Movie Monkey.  Throughout, Edward is constantly warning Bella how hard it is for him to control himself (i.e., not kill her for her blood), and how dangerous it is to be around him, but Bella says she doesn’t care (after all, she can be morose with him her whole life and he won’t grow a day older for it!)  This seemed strangely like women who stay with abusive partners… he can’t help himself, it’s probably my fault.  Hopefully this wasn’t what was intended, but it sure seemed like that message was there.

Overall, probably the best part of the film was Robert Pattinson, who played Edward.  He cannot help the clunky, cliched direction and the leading actress whose acting was so horrific.  (A scene where he tells her that he is leaving so she won’t be threatened receives from her a ”Hey wha don’t wha hey how why wha” scene reminiscent, at best, of Uncle Buck.)   He did the best with what he was given.

The story did have some interest, in that it dreamed this world of vampires with its own mythology and reasoning.  And in the end, there was some action.  But overall, it was cheesy, with bad direction and mostly bad acting.

The one part Your Movie Monkey did like, well one line, actually, had to do with the morality play aspect of the story.  Edward explains to Bella that “every part about me draws you in…. my looks, my hair, my smell.  Not that I’d need any of that.  I’m the perfect killing machine.”  Your Movie Monkey is reminded, at least in small part, of what his daughters will face as they mature and begin to date.  Every part of these guys will draw them in.  They must be very, very careful.  Especially if one of them can fly. 

The New Jack Nicholson?: The Wrestler

February 28, 2009
By

Overall Rating: B+
Filmmaking/Artistic: B
Storytelling: A−
MPAA Rating: R

Overview

An interesting story by (eclectic? unusual? atypical?) director Darren Aronofsky, The Wrestler presents the gritty, realistic drama of the life of a has-been wrestler.   Mickey Rourke plays the wrester, and much like the extremely over-rated Jack Nicholson, has won accolades for what appearst to be essentially playing himself.  The relationship between Rourke’s character and an aging stripper played by Marisa Tomei seems quite believable, and the relationship between the wrestler and his estranged daughter is the basis for an Oscar-deserving scene, but if you’re uninterested in the story of  a wrestler, this won’t be your cup of tea.

Mini-review

Your Movie Monkey has some interest in wrestling, having watched it for about 3 years in the late 90s.  Watching these weekly programs, which Your Movie Monkey found much more creative than most TV sitcoms, YMM never considered that there was entire circuit of semi-pro (or even non-pro) wrestlers out there who play to smaller crowds.  It’s kind of a circuit.  (Contrarian’s wife Bella claims that all circuit folks are far more similar than they are different, be it wrestling, monster trucks, or dog shows.)

In this film, Mickey Rourke plays Jack Nicholson playing Mickey Rourke playing a washed up wrestler, Randy “The Ram” Robinson.  The kind of wrestler who, literally, has a staple gun used on him in the ring, and then gets so little money that he can’t afford rent on his mobile home  (or steriods).  The Ram was so popular in his heyday that he was the star of an Atari game.  But now, although respected by his fellow wrestlers, he has a farily horrible life.

The Ram has a heart attack during one of his matches, and begins to re-evaluate his life.  He has a relationship with a local stripper, played by Marisa Twomei, who is also an actor of sorts, in that she keeps talking about the separation of her stage life and her real life (which involves a young son at home).  He also has an estranged daughter, with whom he now feels that he should  re-unite.

Bascially we learn that wrestling is all that the Ram knows, and his relationships aren’t that great.  We also learn that Mickey Rourke has a very muscly body with a really, really strange face on top, due to many plastic surgeries.

The story is very well written and realistic and gritty.  But it won’t be for everyone.  If you have no interest in wrestling, don’t see it.  Also, Rourke’s performance is very over-rated.  He basically plays himself, like Jack Nicholson.  But if you love Jack Nicholoson, perhaps you’ll like this too.

Marisa Twomei is excellent, and Rachel Evan Wood, who plays his daughter, is phenomenal, and perhaps the best part of the show.

The show is, in short scenes, graphically violent, and has some graphic sexual content, and therefore is not family-friendly.  The relationships presented seem realistic, that is, realistically empty.  The consequence of shallowness and a life lived only for one’s self is also realistically, and sadly, depicted.

What You Didn’t See: Doubt

February 28, 2009
By

Overall Rating: A
Filmmaking/Artisitic: A-
Storytelling: A+
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

The best movie Your Movie Monkey has seen in at least 6 months, Doubt leaves you talking afterward, much as Memento did, about what actually happened.  Your Movie Monkey expected a bashing of the Catholic church due to their recent scandals.  The scandals somewhat set the scene, but the movie is complex and thought provoking, without taking sides (except, of course, that the needs of the kids in a particular Catholic school should outweigh the personalities and methods of the adults who are tasked with guiding them–of that, the movie leaves no doubt).

Full Review

As a teenager, Your Movie Monkey remembers seeing a story on 20/20 or 60 minutes or some similar show, about a priest who had dedicated his life to working with boys (troubled, if memory serves), and  who was accused of having inappropriate relationships.  The angle of the show was that the priest was very likely innocent, and at the time, YMM thought “how sad that this priest can’t have a heart for kids without being accused of something terrible”–specifically, at this tender age, YMM thought that the world was in general so self-centered that any act of selflessness was misunderstood and ascribed to sinister motives.

Your Movie Monkey believes he remembers the name of this priest from the show (although he will not publish it), because it was a priest who was later convicted of the crimes similar to those which had been described.

So what do we, as a society, do?  Ascribe every selfless motive as sinister?  Set up rules so stringent that the actual acts of service become exceedingly difficult to perform?  Doubt attempts to address this question, or at least, leave the viewer free to discuss it.

Meryl Streep plays a very strict nun who is the head of a catholic school in the 1960s.  She reports to a priest played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman.  The priest is young, and of a new tradition… a tradition more about meeting people’s needs where they live than a kind of blind adherence to rules.

An new, young, optimistic nun (Amy Adams) arrives, and is taught to be tough as nails by the head nun.  The new nun has a strange experience where a student of hers is called to the priest’s office, and comes back with a somewhat strange affect, and smelling of alcohol on his breath.  She also sees (later), the priest returning a t-shirt of the boy’s  to the boy’s locker.

That’s it.  That’s the facts.  The rest is conjecture.

The head nun suspects the priest of wrongdoing.  The priest of course denies it, but his method of denial (basically saying “I’m the preist, this doesn’t concern you”) of course doesn’t fly with her.  And what follows is exactly the world of contecture, the world of interpretation, and the world of the male-dominated catholic church.

So what does one do with little information?  Is the priest a misunderstood innocent, or a very clever liar?

It is because of the wrong doing of what is hopefully a minority in the priesthood that these questions must be asked.  How far does one go in the pursuit of the truth?  Is it ok to deceive, to accuse without evidence, to outright lie, in order to get there?  Doubt leaves these questions open.

The movie is very well acted (although Mery’s Streep’s accident changes a lot as the show goes on), and the characters are like those in Spike Lee movies, neither all good nor all bad.  The actress who played the mother of the boy had maybe 10 minutes of screentime, but those minutes were powerful.  She was nominated for an Academy Award for the role, and deserved it.

Your Movie Monkey does not want to give too much away, so he will stop here.  He fully recommends Doubt for those old enough to understand the content.  For younger children who cannot understand the crime of which the priest is accused, it should probably be avoided.

Your Movie Monkey will close his review with his favorite commentary from the movie, a sermon given by the priest upon being accused by the head nun.

A woman confesses to her priest that she is guilty of the sin of gossip.  The priest tells her that, as penance, she should take her finest pillow to the top of her building, and cut it with a knife.  She complies, taking her very best pillow to her roof on a somewhat breezy day, and cuts it, with the mess of feathers floating all around.  She then returns to her priest who tells her that as the last bit of her penance, she should gather the feathers that had spilled, return them to the pillow, and sew it up.  The woman protested, noting that the feathers had by now spread on the winds to many different places, and that gathering them all together would be impossible.

“And that,” said the priest, “is gossip.”

Forrest Gump Part Deux: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

January 5, 2009
By

Overall Rating: C+
Artistic/Filmmaking: B
Storytelling: C-
MPAA Rating: PG-13

Overview

It’s Forrest Gump all over again, but (unbelievably) longer, slower paced, and less interesting.  The main character ages backward, but just as no one blinks an eye in the campy old Batman series whenever a woman dressed in a slinky catsuit and henchmen dressed as tiger cubs walk into a jewelry store, no one seems to notice or care.  There’s almost a 1-1 connection for everything in Forrest Gump, there’s even a “sitting in a hospital at a dying woman’s bed” bookend equivalent to Forrest Gump’s “talking to strangers at a bus stop” bookend, and a “Ya Never Know What’s Comin’ For Ya” to match “Life is Like A Box of Chocolates”.  There’s great acting (although it was IYMMHO one of Cate Blanchett’s rare misses), and it’s very fun to watch the period piece aspects, and there are some positive moments.  Oh, and, for some inexplicable reason, there’s Hurricane Katrina.   

Full Review

The story hook promises more than it delivers.  A man (Benjamin Button) ages backward, and experiences life from about 1920 to 2000.   We start with a woman dying of a Hollywood form of cancer… you know, no pain unless we need to call a nurse for a scene change or other plot device.  She is speaking in this kind of loud mumble to her daughter, and they are clearly southern (turns out to be New Orleans), and she tells the story of a man who lost his son in World War I and, in his grief, made a clock that ran backwards to symbolize the time we want back.  And then disappeared.  Then, she mumbles at her daughter to read a diary out loud, so she can hear the daughter’s voice.  It’s the story of Benjamin Button.

Read more »

Kids love it–adults, meh: The Tale of Despereaux

January 3, 2009
By

Overall Rating: C
Artistic/Filmmaking: A-
Storytelling: D-
MPAA Rating: PG

Overview

An unbelievably well-animated story that is a apparently a “classic” among people who are not my family, The Tale Of Desperaux attempts to throw approximately three stories and maybe 15 or so independent story components to the wall to see what sticks.  The kids will like it (Your Movie Monkey’s daughters did), but, as with Eragon, adults will feel that they’ve seen this all before.  (And, unlike Eragon, the parts you’ve seen before will not always have come from  the highest quality of movies.)

Kid Review

Drama (Your Movie Monkey’s 9-year-old daughter) rated this movie an A- and had this to say:  The Tale of Despereaux started out as a good story.  But then, it just gets really complicated.  The other thing about The Tale of Despereaux that I didn’t care for was that there were a lot of weird things that turned up; i.e., a talking and walking man made out of fruits and vegetables.  But there were a lot of good things about this movie, too.  It was basically a lot of interesting stories, and they are connected in some way or another, and blended into one story.

Queen (Your Movie Monkey’s 7-year-old daughter) rated this movie an A+, and declined further comment.

 Full Review

Your Movie Monkey was a little worried about this movie, for the sheer fact that in the previews, a princess is shown talking to a mouse, and says something like “you’re a strange little mouse”, and the mouse says “thank you”.  It’s the kind of self-referential nonsense Your Movie Monkey finds irritating.  In Your Movie Monkey’s high school, there was a girl who prided herself on being “different”, not one of the crowd, a rugged individual.  The problem was, she was constantly pointing out how different she was being, which made it, somehow, forced.  IYMMHO, a rugged individual is one who does there own thing just because they like it, not because they need attention from it.  Anyway, the mouse saying “thank you” to being described as strange felt very much like something Robin Williams would say in one of his moister on-screen moments.

Read more »

I’ll take depressing stories for $800 Alex: Slumdog Millionaire

December 19, 2008
By

Overall Rating: B-
Filmmaking/Artistic: A-
MPAA Rating: R

Overview

A well-acted, beautifully shot, interesting story about an Indian youth named Jamal who grew up in the slums of Mumbai (a slumdog), who is–against all odds–in the middle of winning the big money on the Indian version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire.  The question is, how?  Turns out that the answer is a long, unbelievably depressing (and fictional) story of  Jamal’s life in the slums.  Violent, perhaps realistic, the question is whether this movie is how you want to spend 2 hours of your time.

Full Review

The subject of intelligence has been of interest for quite some time, especially the concept of innate intelligence.  But of course, the problem is that the natural definition of intelligence (can he figure stuff out) becomes difficult to assess without a frame of reference.  “If there are 3 birds on a fence, and you shoot one, how many are left?”  To a kid who grows up knowing birds only as an abstract concept (that picture in the book is a bird), without being exposed to live birds, the answer might reasonably be two.  But to anyone who has been around a bird (or other animal) when a loud noise goes off (especially a loud noise that fatally wounds a buddy on a nearby fence), the right answer is of course zero.  So which answer shows more intelligence, two or zero?  The answer is, one probably can’t tell from this assessment, which is a lot of the controversy with achievement tests like the SAT.  (Perhaps a better term for these is college preparedness tests… it’s not what one can achieve, it’s how prepared one is for the very specific tasks required in college.  But Your Movie Monkey, as always, digresses.)

Read more »

When San Francisco is just too darn conservative: Madagascar 2–Escape to Africa

December 8, 2008
By

Overall Rating: C-
Filmmaking/Artistic: C
MPAA Rating: PG

Overview

A very strange, somewhat disturbing follow-up to the original Madagascar, this sequel makes no sense unless you’ve already seen the first one, and has a bizarre “anything goes” morality that will probably go over the heads of really young kids, but give pause for those who are older.  An uninteresting story, plus stolen bits from The Lion King, make this a “skip it” movie.

Mini-review

Your Movie Monkey somewhat enjoyed the first Madagascar, especially the penguins, but this second journey definitely goes downhill.  Alex the lion, Marty the zebra, Melman the giraffer, and Gloria the hippo are back, and while attempting to fly back to New York, crash land in Africa.

While there, each has a kind of separate story.  Alex is in the middle of a remake of the lion king, complete with Mufasa-esque dad and Scar-esque evil uncle.  (Producer: What should we do with Alex’s character?  We’re 15 minutes short.  Writer: Hey, I know, there’s this other animated lion movie…)  Marty finds that in Africa, he’s indistinguishable from all the other zebras, because they all look like him (and talk like him, since Chris Rock does all the voices).  It bothers him that Alex can’t tell him apart from the other zebras, so somehow, captivitiy was a good thing.

Gloria falls in love with a very big hippo named Moto Moto, and Melman professes his undying love for Gloria.

The movie is not very interesting… even Your Movie Monkey’s favorites from the first, the penguins, fall a little flat.  They are still somewhat amusing, except for the bit about the doll.  Somehow, the lead penguin has fallen in love with a bobble-head doll.  There are even “incriminating” pictures of him with the doll used as blackmail.  This was a very strange, inappropriate turn for a kids’ movie.

As was Gloria’s relationship with Moto Moto.  Firstly, Gloria and Moto Moto hang out in some form of pond that is clearly meant to look like a hottub.  Moto Moto is even drawn to look like a naked human, as he has chest hair drawn in on his skin in this hot tub scene.  His entire attraction to Gloria is admittedly physical.  Your Movie Monkey found these scenes creepy, and not altogether appropriate.

Plus, there’s a wierd subtheme about making a sacrifice (of Melman) to the “volcano gods”, in order to get water flowing again.   (Melman does this to save Gloria.)  This idea dreamed up by gender-bending King Julien of the lemurs, who at one point pops out with coconut bosoms and asks “Now who’s attracted to me?”   The movie at first makes it seem like Julien is just crazy, and the audience knows the real cause of the water shortage is a logjam upriver.  But when the jam is cleared, and Julien hints that maybe it wasn’t the volcano gods, the volcano kind of spits lava, as if to say “yes it was”.  Strange.

The best part of the movie (IYMMHO) was the return of Alex’s old lady nemesis from New York.  In her fight against the wild beasts of Africa, the beasts had better watch out.

Overall this is a morally ambiguous film that does not portray very good messages.  For a better review than Your Movie Monkey’s, check out the  Decent Films Guide.

Travolta and Cyrus do us proud: Bolt

December 3, 2008
By

Overall Rating: A
Filmmaking/Artistic: A+
MPAA Rating: PG

Overview

Fantastic action, great humor at Hollywood’s expense, and the joy of being a dog.  Bolt has it all, and is fun for kids and adults.  Could be a little scary for kids 5 and under, but overall a great film, well worth seeing.

Full Review

Your Movie Monkey had his doubts.  John Travolta has admittedly a great, familiar voice, especially for those of us old enough to remember Vinnie Barbarino.  (For those of you for whom Welcome Back Kotter was before your time, as a young actor, Mr. Travolta had the power to make us elementary school kids use the phrase “up your nose widda rubber hose” as an insult.  Seriously.)  But as an actor, he’s hit or miss, with one strong hit for every 25 to 50 misses, it seems.  And Miley Cyrus, well, some of us are still smarting from Billy Ray. 

But Bolt came highly recommended from friends, and it certainly did not disappoint.  As promised in the previews, the story revolves around a dog named Bolt who is the star of a popular action show on television.  But as we learn from the oh-so-Hollywood director of the show, Bolt has been raised from puppyhood to think the show going on a round him is real, and that he really does have his superpowers.  (And, wonderfully, the reason for this ruse is a form of method acting: he wants to be able to get shots of a dog who really believes he is an action hero, so it will be realistic.)

Read more »

Archives

Critics
Marvel's The Avengers93%
Dark Shadows42%
Think Like a Man51%
The Hunger Games84%
The Lucky One20%
The Five-Year Engagement63%
The Pirates! Band of Misfits86%
The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel76%
Chimpanzee74%
Safe55%
Critic ratings from
Audience ratings from