Overall Rating: C-
Filmmaking/Artistic: C-
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Overview
Daniel Craig as James Bond and Judi Dench as M succeed despite the pretty bad movie going on around them. Herky-jerky editing makes even the action sequences almost unwatchable, and the plot is almost unintelligible, even for a Bond film.
Full Review
Your Movie Monkey was quite a fan of the first installment of the James Bond series starring Daniel Craig, Casino Royale. In fact, he finds this current Bond actor to be the most, um, believable. (OK, they are all completely unrealistic and quite un-believable, but Mr. Craig certainly is the most believable as the character. Not quite as smarmy as Sean Connery (although Sean Connery was able to say the four-syllable word “Moneypenny” with three and a half syllables in a way that was quite distinctive, something like “MON-uh-PEN-uh”); not near as old as Roger Moore; not so Shakespearean as Timothy Dalton; and clearly more believable as an action star than the prim-but-amusing-and-likeable Pierce Brosnan.
When discussing the new Bond with various folks, you invariably get anyone over 50 saying something like “no one will ever be Bond except Connery” (with one noted exception from a colleague in my office who I believe is over 50 but who [rightly, IYMMHO] claims that Mr. Craig is the best). However, Your Movie Monkey has found that younger folks have taken to this new, more detached Bond. When recalling Casino Royale, most guys seem to say something like “great movie, liked the poker”. Women, on the other hand, seem to have their eyes go slightly out of focus as they reminisce about a speedo-clad Bond walking around in the surf; luckily, only a few have actually drooled.



